Bug#1070137: bullseye-pu: package cloud-init/22.4.2-1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:21:01AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> There are pros and cons to each option. Given bullseye's age and
> cloud-init's blast radius (a regression could potentially disrupt the
> provisioning process of cloud VMs, which is particularly disruptive in
> such environments) I lean toward option (2) above, as it minimizes the
> changes. The obvious drawback is that we now have two versions of
> cloud-init in the bullseye repositories, which was not the case
> previously. The cloud team is committed to supporting this situation
> for the duration of the bullseye LTS lifetime.
I think I lean towards option 2 as well. I assume the versioning is
calendar-based not semantic, so it's hard to know how disruptive 20.x ->
22.x would be, and meaningful testing across all the platforms it could be
deployed on is unrealistic.
Can you attach proposed debian/control and debian/changelog files please?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Reply to: