Bug#1065309: marked as done (transition: gnat (12 -> 13 + time_t64))
Your message dated Fri, 10 May 2024 09:54:01 +0000
with message-id <CAM8zJQu=ekRyAhBq30aDvmL+ct2cPiMiF0o29Pw6FjHGRaPP=Q@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1065309: transition: gnat (12 -> 13 + time_t64)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065309,
regarding transition: gnat (12 -> 13 + time_t64)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1065309: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065309
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: transition: gnat (12 -> 13 + time_t64)
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 14:36:57 +0100
- Message-id: <8a53f896-ee8f-4af8-8bee-4f07fb275598@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas@debian.org>
when preparing GCC packages for time_t64, I noticed that we'll have an
ABI change for libgnat as well. Instead of doing a gnat 12 -> 12+t64
transition, let's do a gnat 12 -> 13+t64 transition instead. According
to Nicolas, packages are already prepared in experimental.
Waiting with the transition until all t64 stuff is finished doesn't work
well, packages which need binNMUs will ftbfs.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Rafael and Nicolas
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 19:58, Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> wrote:
> I will soon upload version 5.15.0+dfsg2-11, with the fix proposed by
> Nicolas in Bug#1070746.
Thanks for the quick turnaround!
gnat 13 has migrated.
Regards
Graham
--- End Message ---
Reply to: