[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1067953: marked as done (transition: flint)

Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 07:37:34 +0200
with message-id <ZjR4HktwdK5HmsPn@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067953: transition: flint
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067953,
regarding transition: flint
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1067953: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:flint
X-Debbugs-Cc: flint@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: dtorrance@piedmont.edu
Severity: normal

Dear Release Team,

I would like to request a transition slot for flint.  The recent upstream
release 3.1.0 introduced the new soversion flint 19.  A new binary package,
libflint19, was introduced in the source package flint 3.1.2-1~exp1, which
cleared the NEW queue on March 28 and is now in experimental.

flint 3.1.1-1 already exists in unstable, which ships libflint.so.19 in
the libflint18t64 binary package.  However, flint 3.0.1-3.1 had been
previously uploaded for the t64 transition, shipping libflint.so.18 in
the same binary package.  This is RC bug #1067226 and has resulted in
several other RC bugs in reverse dependencies.

An auto-flint tracker already exists for the t64 transition, but it doesn't
take the new libflint19 package into account.  (Although perhaps this will
update automatically at some point?)

binNMU's should be sufficient for each of flint's reverse dependencies:

* e-antic
* gyoto
* macaulay2
* msolve
* normaliz
* polymake
* singular

Ben file:

title = "flint";
is_affected = (.build-depends ~ /\blibflint-dev\b/) | (.depends ~ /\blibflint(?:18|18t64|19)\b/);
is_good = .depends ~ /\blibflint19\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /\blibflint18(?:t64)?\b/;

Thank you!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2024-04-02 21:50:32 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2024-03-29 12:46:50 +0000, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:flint
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: flint@packages.debian.org
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: dtorrance@piedmont.edu
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > Dear Release Team,
> > 
> > I would like to request a transition slot for flint.  The recent upstream
> > release 3.1.0 introduced the new soversion flint 19.  A new binary package,
> > libflint19, was introduced in the source package flint 3.1.2-1~exp1, which
> > cleared the NEW queue on March 28 and is now in experimental.
> > 
> > flint 3.1.1-1 already exists in unstable, which ships libflint.so.19 in
> > the libflint18t64 binary package.  However, flint 3.0.1-3.1 had been
> > previously uploaded for the t64 transition, shipping libflint.so.18 in
> > the same binary package.  This is RC bug #1067226 and has resulted in
> > several other RC bugs in reverse dependencies.
> 
> Please go ahead so that reverse dpeendencies can actually build again.

The old binaries got removed. Closing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: