[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1067417: marked as done (nmu: ghostscript_10.02.1~dfsg-3)



Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:22:54 +0100
with message-id <ZfwKfgU1Sn_u_j_-@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067417: nmu: ghostscript_10.02.1~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067417,
regarding nmu: ghostscript_10.02.1~dfsg-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1067417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ghostscript@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ghostscript
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu ghostscript_10.02.1~dfsg-3 . armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
libcups2t64"

For some reason ghostscript on armhf was built with non-t64 libcups2 in the
previous binNMU, other arches look correct, looking at
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libgs10.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-03-21 15:16:35 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ghostscript@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:ghostscript
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu ghostscript_10.02.1~dfsg-3 . armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
> libcups2t64"

Thanks, scheduled.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: