[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1055194: marked as done (transition: openturns)

Your message dated Wed, 6 Mar 2024 07:52:45 +0100
with message-id <e5075d8c-e491-4237-a38d-d427074adb09@debian.org>
and subject line Transition completed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055194,
regarding transition: openturns
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1055194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055194
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: openturns@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openturns

Dear Release Team,

I would like to request a transition slot for openturns. It has been accepted
to experimental after a SONAME bump as some symbols changed in a not
backward-compatible way. It builds correctly.

There is only one rdep, persalys, which FTBFS against the new openturns, but
the new upstream version of persalys builds correctly in experimental (upstream
is the same). I have filled an Important bug anyway, #1055050.

The auto-generated Ben file in the transition tracker looks good.

Thanks a lot,

-- 
Pierre

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Transition completed in November and old binaries got removed.

--
Pierre

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: