Bug#1061645: poco: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Hi Bastian
On 2024-02-06 12:34:32 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Please use the latest experimental QA upload for the 64-bit time_t transition instead of uploading your NMU.
> The other planned transition is documented in #1061645.
> All library package names are SO-bumped, which should be enough to fulfill your intended change.
> This is a cross-posting to ensure the release team is aware of that.
Please beaware that we are doing time_t first and pause all other
transitions until that is complete. We will process the poco transition
independently after time_t is done. Please do not entangle them.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: