[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1059272: marked as done (transition: tango)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:46:05 +0100
with message-id <Za08PYYWbL4TREXX@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1059272: transition: tango
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059272,
regarding transition: tango
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1059272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059272
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: tango@packages.debian.org, thomas.braun@byte-physics.de
Control: affects -1 + src:tango

Dear Release Team,

I would like to upload tango 9.5.0 to unstable. There has been a SONAME
bump from 9.4.2. Its reverse dependency pytango 9.5.0 builds and works
well. Both are available in experimental.

This set of uploads are needed to fix the pytango FTBFS bugs in unstable
related to python3.12:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055733
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049843

Even if there is only one reverse dependency, I prefer to ask: May I go
ahead?

Ben file:

title = "tango";
is_affected = .depends ~ "old="libtango9-4"" | .depends ~ "old="libtango95"";
is_good = .depends ~ "old="libtango95"";
is_bad = .depends ~ "old="libtango9-4"";

Thank you,

 -- Santiago

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2024-01-15 22:24:30 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Hi Santiago
> 
> On 2023-12-27 21:16:02 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2023-12-22 08:36:17 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: tango@packages.debian.org, thomas.braun@byte-physics.de
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:tango
> > > 
> > > Dear Release Team,
> > > 
> > > I would like to upload tango 9.5.0 to unstable. There has been a SONAME
> > > bump from 9.4.2. Its reverse dependency pytango 9.5.0 builds and works
> > > well. Both are available in experimental.
> > > 
> > > This set of uploads are needed to fix the pytango FTBFS bugs in unstable
> > > related to python3.12:
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055733
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049843
> > > 
> > > Even if there is only one reverse dependency, I prefer to ask: May I go
> > > ahead?
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> The autopkgtests of pytango fail on s390x: https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pytango/testing/s390x/
> Could you please take a lookg?

Thoe old binaroes got removed from teting.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: