Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:46:05 +0100 with message-id <Za08PYYWbL4TREXX@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1059272: transition: tango has caused the Debian Bug report #1059272, regarding transition: tango to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1059272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059272 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: tango
- From: Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiago@freexian.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 08:36:17 -0300
- Message-id: <ZYV0sU-JLZLPvFFu@novelo>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: tango@packages.debian.org, thomas.braun@byte-physics.de Control: affects -1 + src:tango Dear Release Team, I would like to upload tango 9.5.0 to unstable. There has been a SONAME bump from 9.4.2. Its reverse dependency pytango 9.5.0 builds and works well. Both are available in experimental. This set of uploads are needed to fix the pytango FTBFS bugs in unstable related to python3.12: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055733 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049843 Even if there is only one reverse dependency, I prefer to ask: May I go ahead? Ben file: title = "tango"; is_affected = .depends ~ "old="libtango9-4"" | .depends ~ "old="libtango95""; is_good = .depends ~ "old="libtango95""; is_bad = .depends ~ "old="libtango9-4""; Thank you, -- SantiagoAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiago@freexian.com>, 1059272-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1059272: transition: tango
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:46:05 +0100
- Message-id: <Za08PYYWbL4TREXX@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZaWijrSJ7OOBh4Nz@ramacher.at>
- References: <ZYV0sU-JLZLPvFFu@novelo> <ZYV0sU-JLZLPvFFu@novelo> <ZYyGAvwG5017Sk-U@ramacher.at> <ZYV0sU-JLZLPvFFu@novelo> <[🔎] ZaWijrSJ7OOBh4Nz@ramacher.at>
On 2024-01-15 22:24:30 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Santiago > > On 2023-12-27 21:16:02 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2023-12-22 08:36:17 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: tango@packages.debian.org, thomas.braun@byte-physics.de > > > Control: affects -1 + src:tango > > > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > > > I would like to upload tango 9.5.0 to unstable. There has been a SONAME > > > bump from 9.4.2. Its reverse dependency pytango 9.5.0 builds and works > > > well. Both are available in experimental. > > > > > > This set of uploads are needed to fix the pytango FTBFS bugs in unstable > > > related to python3.12: > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055733 > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1049843 > > > > > > Even if there is only one reverse dependency, I prefer to ask: May I go > > > ahead? > > > > Please go ahead. > > The autopkgtests of pytango fail on s390x: https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pytango/testing/s390x/ > Could you please take a lookg? Thoe old binaroes got removed from teting. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---