Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable

[Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com>]

Paul,

That is an interesting idea that I could see improving both the release 
process and the quality of the software that ends up in stable.

On Thursday, December 14, 2023 1:06:06 AM MST Paul Gevers wrote:
> I think you're having the right discussion. I'm not a Stable Release 
> Manager so I don't feel authoritative about stable. However, in my 
> *personal* opinion and reflected in a proposal [1] I'm driving (about 
> changes during the freeze, so targeting unstable and testing), we could 
> be accepting more new upstream release *if* upstream release processes 
> and criteria align with our stability criteria. In nearly all cases I 
> expect that to mean a stable branch with strict documented rules and QA 
> processes to guard quality.
> 
> Paul
> 
> [1] 
> https://salsa.debian.org/elbrus/memos/-/blob/main/vetted-upstream-stable-ver
> sions.md

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@stoutner.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.