Re: Matrix update triggering need for four rebuilds
On 18 November 2023 12:14:37 am IST, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> wrote:
>
>On 17 November 2023 at 23:50, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>|
>|
>| On 17 November 2023 11:34:21 pm IST, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> wrote:
>| >
>| >On 17 November 2023 at 18:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
>| >| Am Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:12:02AM -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>| >| > Leaving
>| >| >
>| >| > r-cran-irlba
>| >| > r-cran-openmx
>| >| >
>| >| > for you (unless you got to it already).
>| >|
>| >| To make it pretty clear: I will not simply rebuild these packages before
>| >| we have a promising solution for the future. If you do not agree with
>| >| this you can either
>| >|
>| >| * Ask for Bin-NMU which should be sufficient
>| >| * Do a team upload
>| >
>| >"Our users are our preference". Debian Social Contract.
>|
>| You don't get to play this card with uncoordinated transitions.
>|
>| Nobody is stopping you from doing team uploads for these packages fwiw.
>
>I tried to explain that upstream (both the package and CRAN) have no real
>handle on this so it is by _definition_ what you refer to (in a denigrating
>tone) an uncoordinated transition.
The transition that's being talked about is the debian one (not the upstream one).
This one to be clear:
<https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions>
It is being brought up from time to time of you noticed.
>I'll will retreat and focus on things I
>can control.
Likewise.
Reply to: