Bug#1050977: marked as done (nmu: eg25-manager_0.4.6-1)
Your message dated Sun, 3 Sep 2023 20:11:30 +0200
with message-id <ZPTMUpVU0JZb1jAT@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1050974: binNMU: Rebuild against curl without NSS support
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050977,
regarding nmu: eg25-manager_0.4.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1050977: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:eg25-manager
X-Debbugs-Cc: eg25-manager@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: samueloph@debian.org
Severity: normal
nmu eg25-manager_0.4.6-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against curl without NSS support"
--
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-09-03 17:44:14 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2023-09-02 19:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On top of that, those two packages have already been rebuilt for
> > > riscv64 (no binNMUs required there), whereas if we force another
> > > upload only to solve this, we will trigger a build for every arch and
> > > needlessly consume at the very least 77 hours of the riscv builders'
> > > time (while we are still rebuilding the archive for riscv, delaying it
> > > all).
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-14&arch=riscv64
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-15&arch=riscv64
> > >
> > > Do you think that's a sensible compromise?
> > > I'm asking to proceed with binNMUs because eg25-manager has been fixed
> > > in git already and the llvm packages are about to be removed (although
> > > I want curl to migrate before that), also rebuilding them on riscv
> > > takes a lot of effort at a not-so-great time (no binNMUs required for
> > > riscv).
> >
> > Please get those uploaded instead. We will rebuild
> > llvm-toolchain-{14,15} a bunch of times for transitions anyway. If
> > riscv64 buildds are not ready to cope with that, the architecture is not
> > ready to become a release architecture.
>
> Please note that avoiding an upload on riscv64 is NOT a request from the
> riscv64 porters. Despite the long building time, we believe that the
> build daemons will be able to handle a rebuild of those packages. In
> addition 2 more buildds are being prepared.
ACK, closing those binNMU requests.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: