[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1035710: unblock: doc-debian/11.3



Control: tags -1 confirmed

On Sat, 20 May 2023 16:21:47 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
<sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo cofnirmed
> 
> On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > reopen 1035710
> > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3
> > thanks
> > 
> > Please unblock package doc-debian
> > 
> > [ Reason ]
> > The doc-debian package claims to ship the Constitution for the
Debian Project,
> > the Debian Social Contract and other Debian documents.  The
versions of those
> > documents are obsolete [obsolete], which makes the package as now
in testing
> > very buggy.
> > 
> > [ Impact ]
> > Shipping obsolete foundational documents is misleading and
therefore might
> > lead to confusion.
> > 
> > [ Tests ]
> > None.  (The package ships documentation only, no code is shipped in
the
> > binary package.)
> > 
> > [ Risks ]
> > None.  The doc-debian package is a key package due to Priority:
standard.  It
> > acts as a leaf package: Its only true reverse depends is the live-
task-standard
> > package.[reverse-depends]  In bug #1035913 however, it was shown
that some
> > autopkgtests failed with the new doc-debian due to changes in build
> > environment. This issue now has been properly documented.
> > 
> > [ Checklist ]
> >   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
> >   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> >   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> > 
> > [ Other info ] I made a mistake uploading doc-debian 11.0 to
unstable; that got
> > accepted.  The version 11.3 is now available from experimental. 
I've kept the
> > diff minimal.  Earlier planned and implemented non-related fixes
will, via
> > experimental and unstable, end up in 13/trixie.
> > 
> > unblock doc-debian/11.3
> 
> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable. Remove the moreinfo tag
> once the package is available.

Typo in the control string, fixed it for you

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: