Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm
- To: Guillem Jover <guillem@hadrons.org>, 1026199@bugs.debian.org, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, 1026199@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm
- From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:39:52 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] tslpmb2isp3.fsf@suchdamage.org>
- Reply-to: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>, 1026199@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <Y9Dsvy8/XpsBl7cV@thunder.hadrons.org>
- References: <167115482282.292444.17330970584235210621.reportbug@industrial-algebra.suchdamage.org> <167115482282.292444.17330970584235210621.reportbug@industrial-algebra.suchdamage.org> <f8fc35f6-443a-f979-3702-dc86dfffbb2f@debian.org> <167115482282.292444.17330970584235210621.reportbug@industrial-algebra.suchdamage.org> <Y9Dsvy8/XpsBl7cV@thunder.hadrons.org> <167115482282.292444.17330970584235210621.reportbug@industrial-algebra.suchdamage.org>
>>>>> "Guillem" == Guillem Jover <guillem@hadrons.org> writes:
Guillem> …but hmm, is this perhaps not taking into account
Guillem> Pre-Depends?
Something seems to be wrong.
It was very convenient that pam is not in the essential set--I got to
update it.
And yet login , which sure appears to be essential pre-depends libpam0g,
libpam-modules and libpam-runtime.
But pam (nor those binary packages) are not in the result of the
toolchain freeze.
Reply to: