[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1028283: marked as done (transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-8)

Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2023 17:21:40 +0100
with message-id <Y8wRFKcVvIGpFpzX@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1028283: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028283,
regarding transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1028283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-8.html
Control: affects -1 + src:qtbase-opensource-src

Dear Release team,

As we discussed in #1025863, let's try to get Qt 5.15.8 into unstable.
It's a bugfix release from the 5.15 LTS branch.

Also, there is Qt WebEngine 5.15.12 release, with security backports from
Chromium.

The packages have been prepared in experimental.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2023-01-12 17:07:53 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> Hi Dmitry
> 
> On 2023-01-09 12:26:41 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-8.html
> > Control: affects -1 + src:qtbase-opensource-src
> > 
> > Dear Release team,
> > 
> > As we discussed in #1025863, let's try to get Qt 5.15.8 into unstable.
> > It's a bugfix release from the 5.15 LTS branch.
> > 
> > Also, there is Qt WebEngine 5.15.12 release, with security backports from
> > Chromium.
> > 
> > The packages have been prepared in experimental.
> 
> Please go ahead.
> 
> We'll handle the packages involved involved in the python3.11-default
> transition via tpu after everything has been built in unstable.

It's done. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: