Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:04:49 +0100 with message-id <9c7c4cdd-437b-4ec7-9c86-8440a900bd81@web.de> and subject line Re: Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056204, regarding nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1056204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056204 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7
- From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 20:18:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20231118191801.7f2itiysr4zejjdu@begin>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-Cc: texlive-bin@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:texlive-bin nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new zlib" Hello, Since the upload of zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-1, installing texlive-binaries texlive-base fails: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.ndDMEWN5 [...] fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex luatex.ini' ... PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (zlib library version does not match - header: 1.2.13, library: 1.3) Aborted And indeed texlive-bin checks the zlib version: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=zlib+library+version+does+not+match&hl=en texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7/texk/web2c/luatexdir/luazlib/lzlib.c if (strncmp(version, ZLIB_VERSION, 4)) { lua_pushfstring(L, "zlib library version does not match - header: %s, library: %s", ZLIB_VERSION, version); lua_error(L); } So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems needed on all archs to fix installing texlive-binaries. Samuel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Cc: 1056204-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1056204: nmu: texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7
- From: Preuße, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 17:04:49 +0100
- Message-id: <9c7c4cdd-437b-4ec7-9c86-8440a900bd81@web.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20231118191801.7f2itiysr4zejjdu@begin>
- References: <[🔎] 20231118191801.7f2itiysr4zejjdu@begin>
On 18.11.2023 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new zlib" Hello, Since the upload of zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-1, installing texlive-binaries texlive-base fails: fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.ndDMEWN5The issue has been solved, in Bug#1056586 we'll discuss better / more sustainable solutions. Closing this request here.Hilmar -- sigfaultAttachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---