Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2023 17:27:09 +0200 with message-id <bf3de1d5-7b82-4533-bcfa-1927c2622ab9@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1050405: unblock: sbcl/2:2.3.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1050405, regarding unblock: sbcl/2:2.3.7-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1050405: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: sbcl/2:2.3.7-2
- From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 07:31:02 +0100
- Message-id: <ZOb5JqtD0vyfa/xh@melete.silentflame.com>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: sbcl@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:sbcl Could you hint sbcl into testing, please? The only remaining issue britney shows is that its autopkgtest fails on ppc64el. It's a relatively harmless failure however, to my understanding. Upstream do not seem interested in fixing it for the time being. -- Sean WhittonAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1050405-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1050405: unblock: sbcl/2:2.3.7-2
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 17:27:09 +0200
- Message-id: <bf3de1d5-7b82-4533-bcfa-1927c2622ab9@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <ZOb5JqtD0vyfa/xh@melete.silentflame.com>
- References: <ZOb5JqtD0vyfa/xh@melete.silentflame.com>
Hi, On 24-08-2023 08:31, Sean Whitton wrote:The only remaining issue britney shows is that its autopkgtest fails on ppc64el. It's a relatively harmless failure however, to my understanding. Upstream do not seem interested in fixing it for the time being.I'm not really happy doing this, but hint added to solve RC bug 1049441. PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---