On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:17:38PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Those bugs were set from 'serious' to 'important' by Sebastian Ramacher a few > months ago and I'd like to revisit this decision now that we are at the > beginning of a new release cycle. but why? IME people will be more annoyed about RC bugs they disagree with (even if they only disagree about the severity) than they will be annoyed about the same bug with severity important. what do you gain by making people more annoyed? nothing. the bugs will not be fixed faster and the people will not learn to be less or not annoyed. so there's no point. also because technically it's the right decision from the release team. these bugs are *currently*, in real life, merely cosmetic. policy is not a stick to hit with. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ We need to learn to live with cholera. What is the alternative? Breaking up all streets, building drainage with toilets in every building? (@tadeas_)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature