Bug#1052239: marked as done (transition: ocaml)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2023 19:07:45 +0200
with message-id <ZRRhYSR5I-6BEJrV@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052239,
regarding transition: ocaml
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1052239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: ocaml@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ocaml
Dear Release Team,
I uploaded ocaml 4.14.1 to experimental, and it built successfully on
all release architectures.
I recompiled the OCaml world with it:
http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.14.1/
Note that I excluded scilab, llvm-toolchain-{14,15,16}, coq-unimath
and guestfs-tools, because they take too much time (and I don't expect
particular breakage there).
Not counting those, only 8 packages in testing FTBFS and one more has
a missing dependency. All of them could be removed from testing. Bugs
have been filed:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-4.14.1-transition;users=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
I hereby request a transition slot.
Ben file:
title = "ocaml";
is_affected = .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-4\.13\.1/ | .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-4\.14\.1/;
is_good = .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-4\.14\.1/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-4\.13\.1/;
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-09-26 03:00:49 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 23/09/2023 à 06:54, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> > The following packages should be removed from testing for now:
> >
> > gmetadom otags xmlrpc-light mlpost ulex0.8 ocamlviz
>
> I think Britney needs a little more help: the following packages should also
> be removed from testing:
>
> ocaml-http ocaml-lastfm ocamldap pcre-ocaml
>
> (They are already flagged for autoremoval but that would complete in 3 weeks
> while everything else is ready.)
>
> And also, allow llvm-toolchain-13 (in particular, libllvm-13-ocaml-dev) to
> break.
Done and ocaml migrated. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: