Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml

[Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>]

On 2023-09-23 10:16:20 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-09-23 06:54:50 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Le 20/09/2023 à 09:44, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > Good. Please go ahead
> > 
> > I've uploaded ocaml 4.14.1-1 3 days ago, then uploaded camlp4, ocamlnet, a
> > few other arch:all packages that could not be binNMUed, and binNMUed all the
> > rest.
> > 
> > All packages, except the ones I had already spotted during my test rebuild,
> > built fine on all release architectures:
> > 
> >   https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html
> > 
> > scilab's status is unrelated to this transition; there are open RC bugs for
> > the other "bad" packages:
> > 
> > 
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-4.14.1-transition;users=debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > The following packages should be removed from testing for now:
> > 
> >   gmetadom otags xmlrpc-light mlpost ulex0.8 ocamlviz
> 
> Removal hints added.
> 
> Note though, that are also autopkgtest regressions:
> 
> ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for coq-dpdgraph/1.0+8.17-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: Pass
> ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for coq-quickchick/2.0-2: amd64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), arm64: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Regression ♻ (reference ♻)

Those were old failures before everything was rebuilt. They are now
fixed.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher