[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1050987: marked as done (transition: jimtcl)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:08:04 +0200
with message-id <ZP6uxGZVa9KHl1fi@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1050987: transition: jimtcl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050987,
regarding transition: jimtcl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1050987: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050987
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: jimtcl@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:jimtcl

I'm looking for the transition from jimtcl-0.81 to jimtcl-0.82 due to
an upstream SONAME bump in the new release.

The build of the other packages from testing for the reverse dependencies are
ok:

- usb-modeswitch ok
- openocd

Ben file:

Affected: .depends ~ /\b(libjim0\.82|libjim0\.81)\b/
Good: .depends ~ /\b(libjim0\.82)\b/
Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libjim0\.81)\b/

-- 
Regards,
--
  Bo YU

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2023-09-11 10:27:54 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> hi,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 2:12 AM Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 2023-09-01 11:17:23 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: jimtcl@packages.debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:jimtcl
> > >
> > > I'm looking for the transition from jimtcl-0.81 to jimtcl-0.82 due to
> > > an upstream SONAME bump in the new release.
> >
> > Please go ahead.
> jimtcl-0.82 has been migrated to testing:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1461795/jimtcl-082-4-migrated-to-testing/
> 
> So I think we can close the issue maybe.

The old binaries got removed from testing. So indeed, let's close it.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: