Bug#1043591: marked as done (transition: libnfs)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:58:31 +0000
with message-id <CAM8zJQvQQJ2nENvevDCqbmgOp+qyC=EOp73pfV+Ya_gVG64agw@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1043591: transition: libnfs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043591,
regarding transition: libnfs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1043591: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to update libnfs in unstable to the 5.0.2 version.
It is built for all release architectures in experimental.
The transition would involve libnfs and its reverse
dependencies:
far2l gvfs mpd kodi mpd qemu vlc
All of them build with the new libnfs version:
https://people.debian.org/~rbalint/transitions/libnfs-5/
In terms of 'ben' lingo, the transition has the following parameters:
Affected: .depends ~ /\b(libnfs\-utils|libnfs14|libnfs13)\b/
Good: .depends ~ /\b(libnfs\-utils|libnfs14)\b/ | .recommends ~ /\b(libnfs14)\b/
Bad: .depends ~ /\b(libnfs13)\b/ | .recommends ~ /\b(libnfs13)\b/
Cheers,
Balint
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
libnfs13 is gone from testing, closing.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: