[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1041841: marked as done (transition: pagmo)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2023 15:43:02 +0000
with message-id <CAM8zJQunaoEVHueQxv-EQPWdvew9NRyMj4+EqZywDpLiEHCi+w@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1041841: transition: pagmo
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041841,
regarding transition: pagmo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1041841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pagmo@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pagmo

Dear Release Team,

I would like to ask for a transition slot for pagmo. libpagmo9 has been accepted in experimental, it builds correctly on all the architectures where it built before, and its only rdep openturns builds successfully against it.

The auto-generated Ben file is good.

Thanks a lot,

Cheers,

-- 
Pierre

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
libpagmo8 is gone from testing, closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: