[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1028528: marked as done (transition: libcotp)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Jun 2023 22:32:48 +0200
with message-id <ZJyY8CroZF2jsgLl@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
has caused the Debian Bug report #1028528,
regarding transition: libcotp
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1028528: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1.

I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the
library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0
introducing the ABI change has been in experimental since 2023-01-10.

I have successfully rebuilt the reversed dependencies on amd64.

$ reverse-depends -b src:libcotp
Reverse-Build-Depends
* otpclient                     (for libcotp-dev)

There is already a tracker available here:

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcotp.html

Thanks!
-- 
Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro <vilmar@debian.org>
4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2023-06-20 00:34:50 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
> 
> On 2023-06-12 19:40:14 +0000, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> > Hello Sebastian,
> > 
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:26:50 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 trixie
> > > 
> > > On 2023-01-19 15:38:06 +0000, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> > > > Hi Sebastian,
> > > > 
> > > > On 1/17/23 22:37, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 2023-01-12 11:45:45 +0000, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote:
> > > > >> Package: release.debian.org
> > > > >> Severity: normal
> > > > >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > >> Usertags: transition
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Dear Release Team,
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the
> > > > >> library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why is the SONAME going backwards?
> > > > > 
> > > > I believe this was an upstream decision, please check it out:
> > > > 
> > > > "the soversion is now set only from the $major version (e.g. 2),
> > > > and not from $major$minor (e.g. 12) like it used to be."
> > > > https://github.com/paolostivanin/libcotp/releases/tag/v2.0.0
> > > 
> > > Is upstream aware that the can never release with major versions 11 and
> > > 12 (at least)? Please clarify this with upstream.
> > > 
> > Yes, upstream is aware of this.
> > 
> > 
> > > In any case, let's postpone this transition to trixie.
> > > 
> > I just uploaded version 2.0.1-1~exp1 for experimental.
> > I await your authorization to proceed with the transition.
> 
> Please go ahead.

The old packages got removed from testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: