[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036984: marked as done (unblock: packagekit/1.2.6-5)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2023 13:49:50 +0200
with message-id <4d619256-0be0-aaaf-dd85-b003fdf3db54@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1036984: unblock: packagekit/1.2.6-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036984,
regarding unblock: packagekit/1.2.6-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1036984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036984
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package packagekit.

[ Reason ]
Three things fixed:
* A tiny memory leak has been addressed
* The daemon package now recommends the tools package again, this was
changed late in release and apparently caused issues to some people
(see the referenced bug)
* Many parts of the documentation reference the old packagekit.org
domain, which is now taken over by a 3rd-party who is playing ads on
it - so far it's harmless, but we do not know what will happen with
this domain in future, so we should avoid referencing it and rather
point at the right location @ freedesktop.org

[ Impact ]
People could click through to a defunct website with tracking ads when
trying to reach the PackageKit documentation or information about e.g.
missing codecs.

[ Tests ]
The memleak fix has been upstreamed for a while and is harmless, the
changed recommendation restores previous behavior, and the
documentation changes do not have any behavioral change.

[ Risks ]
Very low, as the only functional change is adding a missing free() for
a memory leak fix, every other change is either purely in the
documentation or restores previously tested behavior.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

Thank you!

unblock packagekit/1.2.6-5

Attachment: packagekit_1.2.6-4_to_1.2.6-5.debdiff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 31-05-2023 15:02, Matthias Klumpp wrote:

unblock packagekit/1.2.6-5


unblocked and aged.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: