[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1036787: marked as done (unblock: jed/0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6)

Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 09:19:09 +0000
with message-id <E1q2q4r-00H3Qi-W5@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock jed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036787,
regarding unblock: jed/0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1036787: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036787
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1035839@bugs.debian.org, jed@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:jed

Please unblock package jed.

The version in unstable fixes the RC bug #1036096. This bug was intended 
to be fixed in version jed/0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-5 of the package, but was 
reopened by Andreas Beckmann, who spotted a problem in the 
{jed,xjed}.maintscript files, namely the lack of epoch in version 
numbers.

I am attaching to this message the debdiff between versions 
0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-5 and -6.

unblock jed/0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6

Best,

Rafael Laboissière

diff -Nru jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/changelog jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/changelog	2023-05-16 14:19:52.000000000 -0300
+++ jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/changelog	2023-05-25 04:40:36.000000000 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+jed (1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * d/*.maintscript: Add epoch to the version number in symlink_to_dir setting.
+    The version in the {jed,xjed}.maintscript files is bumped to
+    1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6~, such that the cleanup is performed on both
+    upgrades from stable to testing (missed cleanup) and from testing to
+    unstable (fixed cleanup).
+    Thanks to Andreas Beckmann for spotting the problem and suggesting its solution.
+    (Closes: #1036096)
+
+ -- Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org>  Thu, 25 May 2023 04:40:36 -0300
+
 jed (1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Add files d/{jed,xjed}.maintscript.
diff -Nru jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/jed.maintscript jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/jed.maintscript
--- jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/jed.maintscript	2023-05-16 14:19:52.000000000 -0300
+++ jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/jed.maintscript	2023-05-25 04:32:20.000000000 -0300
@@ -1 +1 @@
-symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/jed jed-common 0.99.20~pre.151+dfsg-1~
+symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/jed jed-common 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6~
diff -Nru jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/xjed.maintscript jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/xjed.maintscript
--- jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/xjed.maintscript	2023-05-16 14:19:52.000000000 -0300
+++ jed-0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg/debian/xjed.maintscript	2023-05-25 04:32:11.000000000 -0300
@@ -1 +1 @@
-symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/xjed jed-common 0.99.20~pre.151+dfsg-1~
+symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/xjed jed-common 1:0.99.20~pre.178+dfsg-6~

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Unblocked.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: