Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?

Am 22.05.23 um 21:34 schrieb Sam Hartman:

enough benefit to justify breaking testing.


No-one is breaking testing, as files are not moved between packages.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>

References:
- Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?
  - From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
- Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?
  - From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
- Re: Is an MBF and unblock for packages introducing new files in /bin or /sbin or /lib in Bookworm acceptable at this stage?
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>