Bug#1033900: pre-approval: dkms/3.0.10-10
- To: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>, 1033900@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1033900: pre-approval: dkms/3.0.10-10
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 07:41:59 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 8605e8ab-cf3a-b470-3fca-818448b27697@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, 1033900@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <7d6648f2-52fb-6d0b-5a26-60545daf730c@debian.org>
- References: <168054239411.2947858.9455524904797928745.reportbug@zam504.zam.kfa-juelich.de> <562013d0-4da1-fdd3-d08b-24e94c6d2bf9@debian.org> <168054239411.2947858.9455524904797928745.reportbug@zam504.zam.kfa-juelich.de> <7d6648f2-52fb-6d0b-5a26-60545daf730c@debian.org> <168054239411.2947858.9455524904797928745.reportbug@zam504.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
On 27-04-2023 18:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
So unless
something else appears that warrants an unblock, let's not do this.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I've just uploaded a new upstream release 3.0.11-1 with some additional
bugfixes to experimental. Most patches are now applied upstream.
While you elaborated how you created a nice debdiff, you forgot to tell
why a new upstream release is a targeted fix. What is it fixing? (Does
this really follow the freeze policy?)
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: