[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1034380: marked as done (unblock: opm-models/2022.10+ds-4)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:09:48 +0200
with message-id <c5f9523f-544b-7573-d80f-bb585159a772@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1034380: unblock: opm-models/2022.10+ds-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034380,
regarding unblock: opm-models/2022.10+ds-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1034380: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package opm-models


[ Reason ]
Package contains fixes to d/*control files. Is blocked only because britney
thinks that not all autopkgtests have run, but those for official architectures
with binaries have run

[ Impact ]
No impact on the user if this is not unblocked

[ Tests ]
All autopkgtests for architectures with binaries have run

[ Risks ]
None, because no real code is changed

[ Checklist ]
  [X] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]
None

unblock opm-models/2022.10+ds-4

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 221675485..5a43ea694 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+opm-models (2022.10+ds-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * d/(tests/)control: Limit the architectures to known working ones.
+
+ -- Markus Blatt <markus@dr-blatt.de>  Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:43:28 +0100
+
+opm-models (2022.10+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Release to unstable (no-change)
+
+ -- Markus Blatt <markus@dr-blatt.de>  Wed, 08 Mar 2023 23:45:45 +0100
+
+opm-models (2022.10+ds-2) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+  * d/control: Bumped standards version to 4.6.2
+
+ -- Markus Blatt <markus@dr-blatt.de>  Mon, 09 Jan 2023 15:55:47 +0100
+
 opm-models (2022.10+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream version 2022.10
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index fa91260d4..add7ae3c6 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), cmake,
 # Build-Depends-Indep: # broken on precise pbuilder
  doxygen, texlive-latex-extra, texlive-latex-recommended, ghostscript,
  zlib1g-dev
-Standards-Version: 4.6.0
+Standards-Version: 4.6.2
 Homepage: http://opm-project.org
 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-models
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opm-models.git
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Rules-Requires-Root: no
 
 Package: libopm-models-dev
 Section: libdevel
-Architecture: any
+Architecture: amd64 arm64 armel ia64 m68k mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64
 Multi-Arch: same
 Depends: ${misc:Depends},
  libdune-grid-dev, libdune-istl-dev,
diff --git a/debian/tests/control b/debian/tests/control
index 423df4959..fdc4cac7a 100644
--- a/debian/tests/control
+++ b/debian/tests/control
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ Depends:
   libboost-test-dev
 # skip test on architectures where there is no installable package (e.g. 32bit)
 Restrictions: allow-stderr, skip-not-installable
+Architecture: amd64 arm64 armel ia64 m68k mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Markus,

On 17-04-2023 08:33, Markus Blatt wrote:

I am perfectly fine with keeping this blocked and closing the bug.
Except, that somehow it blocks opm-models, which blocks opm-common. I *think* that's because you dropped the build on armhf and had the binaries removed *after* you uploaded the new versions to unstable. So the removal of the binaries can only migrate with the new sources. 

Hence, unblocking.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: