Re: Situation for redis for bookworm?
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On 26-03-2023 13:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > redis is on the radar for that, recent uploads for unstable did fix
> > some (arguably no-dsa) CVEs. Redis is though not able to migrate to
> > testing. Can you have a look and if the testing regressions are fase
> > positives or to be ignore fill a unblock request for the release team?
>
> Chris already did in bug 1030600, e.g.
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030600#30. I see redis
> had another upload, which apparently doesn't trigger the autopkgtest failure
> in python-fakeredis.
Apologies that I did not notice.
> Might be worth unblocking this version of redis if all upstream uploads can
> be justified.
The new version does not have any further regressions, as per
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=redis . So I think that
would be welcome to resolve all the CVEs still affecting bookworm.
Chris, what is your take on it?
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: