Your message dated Sat, 4 Mar 2023 17:27:47 +0100 with message-id <a1c94796-3910-3c31-6900-4df2f46550cf@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1031592: unblock: poke/3.0+dfsg has caused the Debian Bug report #1031592, regarding unblock: poke/3.0+dfsg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1031592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031592 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: unblock: poke/3.0+dfsg
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 19:03:17 -0500
- Message-id: <87h6vied2y.fsf@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi there, I decided to file this request even though this is *not* going to involve any transition nor anything big. Please let me know if you prefer to be contacted via other channels. [ Reason ] poke has recently released version 3.0. Unfortunately, due to personal reasons, I was unable to work on updating our package until this weekend. I believe it is in the best interest of our users to have poke 3.0 shipped in bookworm, not only because of the several bugs that are being fixed, but also because other GNU/Linux distributions are already shipping the latest version to their users. [ Impact ] Shipping the current version of poke in testing (2.4) will make the bookworm release already outdated when compared to other distributions. [ Risks ] poke is not a key package. Nothing reverse-depends on it. If we encounter any problems with poke, it will not affect any essential part of the system. [ Other Info ] I've uploaded poke 3.0 to experimental. You can confirm that the package successfully builds: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=poke&suite=experimental Please let me know if you need more information to proceed with this request. Thank you in advance, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org>, 1031592-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1031592: unblock: poke/3.0+dfsg
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 17:27:47 +0100
- Message-id: <a1c94796-3910-3c31-6900-4df2f46550cf@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <87k00dcrsr.fsf@sergiodj.net>
- References: <87h6vied2y.fsf@debian.org> <Y/KC2qZqIUY6k6Qr@ramacher.at> <87h6vied2y.fsf@debian.org> <87k00dcrsr.fsf@sergiodj.net>
Hi Sergio, On 19-02-2023 21:40, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:There are many new features and bugfixes in this release. It is a major update, but doesn't introduce new binary packages nor changes that affect other Debian packages. You can see a summary of new changes here: https://sources.debian.org/src/poke/3.0%2Bdfsg-1/NEWS/#L10From lines 10 to 313.I understand that it is a lot to read and digest, and you probably have more important things to do, so I'm not expecting an in-depth analysis here.Please see our FAQ [1]. I think the silence means this is most likely not appropriate. I'm seeing quite some "new $something", so I won't ACK this.Paul [1] https://release.debian.org/testing/FAQ.htmlAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---