Bug#1032065: ola: request RT acknowledgement for update to upstream version 0.10.9
- To: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Cc: 1032065@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1032065: ola: request RT acknowledgement for update to upstream version 0.10.9
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 12:41:05 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZAHOwSC2uNHkKwq3@pc220518.home.grep.be>
- Reply-to: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>, 1032065@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <36a3069d-3a89-5949-e416-921078d5e90a@debian.org>
- References: <167749479226.211420.379067350857163142.reportbug@pc220518.home.grep.be> <58fa5fff-5e22-eb68-19ab-bdb6ab69440a@debian.org> <Y/0woRzSVsHPekiB@pc220518.home.grep.be> <36a3069d-3a89-5949-e416-921078d5e90a@debian.org> <167749479226.211420.379067350857163142.reportbug@pc220518.home.grep.be>
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:06:25PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> On 27-02-2023 23:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > To be clear: this would require a pass through NEW, for the RDM tester
> > package ("ola-rdm-tester"). That's okay then? If so, can you add the
> > unblock? If not, I'll leave the rdm-tester for after the release.
>
> No, adding new binaries is not OK.
Thanks. I had assumed that, but my email was a bit muddled and so I just
wanted to be clear.
I've uploaded 0.10.9 without the RDM tester (so no NEW cycle is needed).
That will wait until after the release.
Kind regards,
--
w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}
I will have a Tin-Actinium-Potassium mixture, thanks.
Reply to: