[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1030672: marked as done ([pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.20)

Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2023 04:19:13 +0100
with message-id <Y/l+MRyPn5XR4Jqs@thunder.hadrons.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1030672: [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030672,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: dpkg/1.21.20
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1030672: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030672
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: dpkg@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg

Hi!

Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.20 upload.

[ Reason ]

This dpkg release includes the translation updates for the recent Call
for Translations, a few test suite fixes to make them pass again due
to these translations and a recent cppcheck upload in unstable. A typo
fix in the man pages. Updates to the lintian overrides. And fixes a
typo in the Build-Depends that made the version too low.

[ Impact ]

These would give better translation coverage, the rest are not
relevant to the final user, but can affect CI systems and downstream
users, as they are build/test system fixes.

[ Tests ]

The various test suite fixes are due to the test suite failing now.
The Build-Depends fix should be self-evident and would otherwise make
the build fail. The new translations pass the tests too.

[ Risks ]

These all seem like very low risk changes to me.

[ Checklist ]

  [√] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [√] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [√] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]

Actually, I've only attached the filtered debdiff, and not the unfiltered
one here, as due to the translations it seems a bit big, and I'm afraid
it might make the mail not get through. It can be found at:

  https://people.debian.org/~guillem/dpkg-1.21.19-1.21.20.debdiff.xz

That debdiff is unfiltered, you might want to filterdiff with, which
should give the same result as the attached one:

  xzcat dpkg-1.21.19-1.21.20.debdiff.xz |
    filterdiff --exclude '*.po' --exclude '*.pot' \
               --exclude '*/man/*/*.pod' \
               --exclude '*/testsuite' --exclude '*/at/*.m4' \
               --exclude '*/configure'

Alternatively I've pushed all except for the usual update-po and
actual release commit and tag to:

  https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/log/

unblock dpkg/1.21.20

Thanks,
Guillem

Attachment: dpkg-1.21.19-1.21.20.debdiff-filtered.xz
Description: application/xz


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 11:44:44 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 09:01:44 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 06/02/2023 12:43, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.20 upload.
> 
> > Please go ahead. Late translations are also OK to include.
> 
> Thanks! Uploaded it yesterday.

And since it even migrated, I guess it should be fine to close now. :)

Regards,
Guillem

--- End Message ---
Reply to: