[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1024322: marked as done (transition: dpdk)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2022 12:26:10 +0100
with message-id <Y6rWUgavTwHFqbuU@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024322,
regarding transition: dpdk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1024322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024322
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org zigo@debian.org

Hello Thomas and Release Team,

As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow
Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This
will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects,
as we have done for the past few releases.

Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if
necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable,
ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the
transition.

Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no
soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that
point). The upstream release might happen before or after the
2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an
exception.

Would this plan work for everyone?

Bullseye tickets for reference:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974588
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974667

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Luca

On 2022-12-26 10:59:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Already uploaded to remove those tests for now, can be fixed later

The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing.

Cheers

> 
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, 10:43 Sebastian Ramacher, <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 2022-12-22 20:43:20 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On 2022-12-22 20:16:36 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
> > > > <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Luca
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher
> > > > <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > > > > > X-Debbugs-CC:
> > > > pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org zigo@debian.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to
> > > > allow
> > > > > > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS.
> > > > This
> > > > > > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both
> > > > projects,
> > > > > > > > as we have done for the past few releases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if
> > > > > > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to
> > > > unstable,
> > > > > > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to
> > > > finish the
> > > > > > > > transition.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable
> > > > (no
> > > > > > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the
> > > > > > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an
> > > > > > > > exception.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Would this plan work for everyone?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the
> > > > moreinfo
> > > > > > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in
> > > > experimental.
> > > > > > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and
> > > > are
> > > > > > already compatible.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please go ahead
> > > >
> > > > Only src:uhd has been rebuilt, please rebuild src:collectd too (it only
> > > > has Recommends instead of Depends as it's a plugin-based software, so
> > > > it won't show in apt rdepends et al).
> > >
> > > I'll schedule those builds once dpkd migrated. Otherwise the rebuilds
> > > migrate before the recommends can be satisfied in testing.
> >
> > collect has been rebuilt.
> >
> > There's one remaining issue: openvswitch is causing autopkgtest
> > regressions in ovn-octavia-provider on the 32 bit architectures.
> >
> > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/o/ovn-octavia-provider/29661632/log.gz
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > --
> > > Sebastian Ramacher
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Ramacher
> >

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: