[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1027022: marked as done (RM: puppet-beaker/4.30.0-2)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2022 16:47:18 +0100
with message-id <953e59c4-d3b3-e685-ecc4-9783248e4e93@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1027022: RM: puppet-beaker/4.30.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027022,
regarding RM: puppet-beaker/4.30.0-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1027022: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027022
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove puppet-beaker from testing.

It is orphaned, broken, outdated compared to upstream, and blocks the
migration of ruby-net-scp (that's how I ran into it)

I tried updating it to the latest upstream version but failed.

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 26-12-2022 16:15, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

On 26/12/22 at 15:30 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
I am mainly interested in restoring a clean state for ruby-net-scp
(which cannot migrate without an update of puppet-beaker in testing, or
a removal of puppet-beaker from testing).

Someone with more interest in puppet-beaker than I have might be able to
fix it, and then it could migrate again. So I'd rather keep it in
unstable for now.


Fair enough.


autoremoval will remove it on 10 January (under normal circumstances). Can
we wait until then?


Yes, it can wait until Jan 10th (but then I need to remember to check
that ruby-net-scp migrates after Jan 10th).


A simple check showed no reverse (build) dependencies, so I've added a hint.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: