Re: YA Grub update for bullseye (and buster!)
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:01:47PM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote:
>On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 14:47 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:36:50AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> > Hi Steve,
>> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 12:15:57AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[...]
>> > > * What's the preferred way to go for Bullseye, given we're just
>> > > about
>> > > to do another point release? Should I go down the security
>> > > path or
>> > > just upload straight to bullseye and go via s-p-u?
>> >
>> > I think for this one (and give the timeframe for the point
>> > release), a
>> > stable-proposed-updates is more appropriate. I agree, the
>> > functional
>> > regression is caused by the security fix, but to me it looks enough
>> > that we can go here the point release path (unless a SRM now
>> > strongly
>> > disagrees). The window is closing this weekend for the uploads.
>>
>> ACK. I'll give Adam a short while to chime in...
>
>I was going to say I'd defer to the security team when I read the
>initial mail, so... either way works for me, as long as it happens
>soonish.
ACK, I'll go ahead with the stable-proposed-updates upload now then.
Cheers!
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.
Reply to: