Bug#1024184: marked as done (transition: alkimia)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2022 15:08:24 +0100
with message-id <Y4Id2AMwmNn3Rckh@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1024184: transition: alkimia
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024184,
regarding transition: alkimia
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1024184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: hefee@debian.org, pkg-kde-talk@lists.alioth.debian.org
A easy transition as it has only one package depdens on alkimia:
kmymoney (successfully builds with old and new version of alkimia).
The new version of alkimia depends on serveral new libriaries, it is
hard to say if the new version will compile on all archs as before. It
seems like the last Qt transition is still challangeing some buildds. So
we may loose some archs with this transtion.
hefee
Ben file:
title = "alkimia";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libalkimia5-7" | .depends ~ "libalkimia5-8";
is_good = .depends ~ "libalkimia5-8";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libalkimia5-7";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-11-19 20:16:55 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2022-11-15 22:09:46 +0100, Hefee wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: hefee@debian.org, pkg-kde-talk@lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
> > A easy transition as it has only one package depdens on alkimia:
> >
> > kmymoney (successfully builds with old and new version of alkimia).
> >
> > The new version of alkimia depends on serveral new libriaries, it is
> > hard to say if the new version will compile on all archs as before. It
> > seems like the last Qt transition is still challangeing some buildds. So
> > we may loose some archs with this transtion.
>
> Please go ahead
The old binaries got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: