Bug#1023550: transition: qcustomplot
Greetings Sebastian,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:05:07PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Filippo
[...]
> Thanks! Please go ahead with the transition.
I just uploaded the package to unstable. I have not closed the bug yet, waiting
to check that everything goes fine.
qcustomplot's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at
them? Thanks
It is weeks that I monitor the salsa stuff, but I do not understand what these
tests mean. One example (bear with me):
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:5 (FIND_PACKAGE):
By not providing "FindQt5PrintSupport.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this
project has asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by
"Qt5PrintSupport", but CMake did not find one.
Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5PrintSupport"
with any of the following names:
Qt5PrintSupportConfig.cmake
qt5printsupport-config.cmake
debian/control
--------------
Build-Depends:
debhelper (>= 13),
cmake (>= 3.18),
qtbase5-dev (>= 5.12),
qt6-base-dev (>= 6.2.0)
% apt-file search Qt5PrintSupportConfig.cmake
qtbase5-dev: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5PrintSupport/Qt5PrintSupportConfig.cmake
So, I do not understand why the autopkgtest does not do the right thing: install
the packages I have listed in Build-Depends...
I always build my packages with cowbuilder (gbp buildpackage) in a pristine
enviroment... Further, how can that be that the build passes and then the build
of autopkgtest fails?
I'd be happy to learn more about all this, but for the moment these inconsistencies make me dubitative...
Sincerely,
Filippo
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Filippo Rusconi, PhD
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Research scientist at CNRS
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://msxpertsuite.org
http://www.debian.org
Reply to: