Hi Bas, On 23-11-2022 05:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The libgdal-grass autopkgtest in testing is failing because it requires gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass from unstable.https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gdalThis combination needs to be tested to fix the regressions shown and unblock testing migration of gdal and the related rebuilt packages.
I'll schedule the set, but I have the feeling that a proper versioned relation (maybe an upper limit??) is missing somewhere. As there are quite a few versioned binaries involved already, it's obvious that there's a design. But if there's a runtime check for a version, ideally that should be expressed in dependencies too. Unless I'm missing something of course. (If that dependency would be there, britney would ask apt to pin packages from the source providing it from unstable if they are not fulfilled in testing).
"""ERROR: Module built against version 2022-11-20T19:27:33+00:00 but trying to use version 2022-10-25T05:34:10+00:00. You need to rebuild GRASS GIS
or untangle multiple installations. """ """ERROR 1: OGR/GRASS driver was compiled against GDAL 3.5, but the current library version is 3.6 ERROR 1: GDAL/GRASS driver was compiled against GDAL 3.5, but the current library version is 3.6
""" Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature