Bug#1023495: transition: ruby3.1
On 2022-11-22 21:53:31 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On 22-11-2022 17:03, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > After discussing with Antonio, since our deadline to finish the
> > transition is approaching, we decided to already enable ruby3.1 as the
> > default and remove ruby3.0 in a single step.
>
> I may be remembering wrong (it's a bit late), but isn't the change of the
> default a forward rebuild, while removal is a backward rebuild (I mean in
> the dependency tree)? If that's true, I think doing it in two steps is
> easier to manage, as packages can then migrate on their own and don't need a
> lock step migration.
That's correct. I'd prefer to handle this with two trackers.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: