[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1023849: marked as done (pysph needs hinting into testing)



Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2022 09:29:41 +0100
with message-id <Y29Zdb9XzHLI/QBG@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1023849: pysph needs hinting into testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023849,
regarding pysph needs hinting into testing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1023849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

The latest version FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x.

The binaries on these architectures were already removed,
but due to previous successful tests and binary-all package
britney counts it as a regression.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-11-11 14:05:10 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> The latest version FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x.
> 
> The binaries on these architectures were already removed,
> but due to previous successful tests and binary-all package
> britney counts it as a regression.

Hint added.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: