[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021205: marked as done (transition: simdjson)

Your message dated Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:52:29 +0100
with message-id <Y2Q4HQUadw3MeZMk@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1021205: transition: simdjson
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021205,
regarding transition: simdjson
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1021205: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021205
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi release team,

I'd like to start the transition of simdjson. It has only two reverse
dependencies in testing:

 cloudflare-ddns
 pcm

Both of them passed my local test with amd64 host.


Ben file:

title = "simdjson";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libsimdjson9" | .depends ~ "libsimdjson13";
is_good = .depends ~ "libsimdjson13";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libsimdjson9";
Thank you for using reportbug

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2022-10-09 12:55:41 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/10/2022 16:43, M. Zhou wrote:
> > Thanks. It has been uploaded to unstable.
> 
> binNMUs scheduled.

… and all the old binaries got removed from testing. Closing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: