Bug#1022705: marked as done (unplanned transition: ghostscript)
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2022 18:39:38 +0100
with message-id <Y1622sv0TqI1q9Dz@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1022705: unplanned transition: ghostscript
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022705,
regarding unplanned transition: ghostscript
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1022705: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022705
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: dr@jones.dk
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ghostscript.html
Affects: src:ghostscript src:gimp src:dvisvgm src:libspectre src:xfig
ghostscript appears to have started an unscheduled transition from libgs9
and libgs9-common to libgs10 and libgs-common. libgs-common Breaks and
Replaces libgs9-common, so the affected packages will all have to migrate
together.
Looking at ghostscript's changelog, it seems this might have been
accidental? There's no mention of the experimental version having been
intentionally re-uploaded to unstable.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ghostscript.html looks
like it is tracking the affected packages, so I haven't tried to write a
ben file for this.
Please coordinate with the release team to either finish or revert
this transition.
Thanks,
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-10-28 01:30:03 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-10-24 15:15:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Also, it would have been nice to disentangle the -common rename from the SONAME
> > > bump.
> >
> > Yes, I agree that would have been more elegant.
>
> I have uploaded a new version that partially reverts the change.
> Unfortunately, libgs9-common contained the unversioned ICC profiles, so
> we will end up some Breaks+Replaces for the bullseye to bookworm
> upgrade. With that in mind, the new version keeps the ICC profiles in
> libgs-common and the version specific files are moved back to
> libgs10-common.
… and the tranistion is now done. libgs9 was removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: