Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.6: Status update + prepared to start
TL;DR I consider myself ready to start the transition now, with removals
in the plan.
* gupnp/experimental has now successfully built on s390x
- this verifies gssdp 1.6.0-2 (with patch from upstream) fixes an old
bug caught by the (new) gupnp test
* Note: ppc64el has still not built experimental packages yet
* Following rdeps are now prepared in experimental:
- rygel 0.42.0-1
- gupnp-tools 1.2.0-1
- gupnp-igd 1.2.0-2
- caja-extensions 1.26.1-1.1
* Plan to file for RM RoQA dleyna
- has a new upstream and 4 repos/sources merged into 1.
- NEW dleyna 0.8 packages prepped in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dleyna
- needs maintainer + NEW
- details in https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnome-maintainers/2022-October/174113.html ( #1022009 #1022010 #1022011 #1023093 )
- I will possibly upload 0.8 to experimental for exposure after
transition is done (via NEW, not sure if Debian QA maintained
packages is accepted in NEW).
* Suggestion to temporarily remove librm (+ roger-router) from testing
- as previously mentioned upstream porting to gssdp/gupnp 1.6 is broken
- needs porting to libsoup 3.0
- upstream main branch has had this issue for 10+ months.
- No response yet in https://gitlab.com/tabos/librm/-/issues/4 or #1022008
Unless someone tells me I missed something I'll start uploading to
unstable as soon as I feel I have a free time slot (which might be later
today).
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
Reply to: