[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021093: marked as done (transition: ros2-rcutils)



Your message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:39:08 +0200
with message-id <Y1rCPGJb8qgkYon1@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1021093: transition: ros2-rcutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021093,
regarding transition: ros2-rcutils
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1021093: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear release team,

I'd like to transition ros2-rcutils after a SONAME bump.
I could rebuild all reverse dependencies on amd64 successfully.

The Ben tracker at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ros2-rcutils.html
looks mostly fine, even though I would have expected ros-ros-comm in
dependency level 2.


Cheers
Timo


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmM4v40ACgkQ+C8H+466
LVlD2Qv/dVq3i6htTlnsWKjM3fmiAhGvQG2SE2u3tIU7Yajo3BTGBeiRNBto5QCm
yup2Z33g1VEGsOGNiwUwuxAhop8zsTQUwrgcqh8A8ZIHvSnKs2laTWe/V2JQzmwU
ehaDC2d8mI1lnK6oA68dU8kwYgxFfelTh4long3qS+SqnaTaRf7f/ACn+C+Vm0jk
gVQNLu3RFhAWD4SZ5ReU+UO0EeHbi/aAOsVlZhmhxQ5c/Qxa1EDxHRx4+rk7/jen
TeTI3yZ9qGrCygM7ivbxBQ7fGWFB3nEehgLcabsA0ywtugQ1T9Wcz8g3iEeBHPbi
UF4nA344L22rx6taWUi2on86a/BgZ2sNwuFNC++o4LM7y9kE1mx8vMz2tdQPMbpb
jSNPuW0F1RYCV0HRSaNXrKXZ9eD4ZAHc8m2bLqKIvRzkp1I90YOJDzJczKrWhASh
pjepRKgkEbE56qeGoDq1RO5K3+pt1O6/G5sdEBL6JLbIJ67lowkDUVMqmasbdUZ6
hYyn2Ow/
=BT9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-10-02 15:57:49 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2022-10-02 00:30:41 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Dear release team,
> > 
> > I'd like to transition ros2-rcutils after a SONAME bump.
> > I could rebuild all reverse dependencies on amd64 successfully.
> > 
> > The Ben tracker at
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ros2-rcutils.html
> > looks mostly fine, even though I would have expected ros-ros-comm in
> > dependency level 2.
> 
> Please go ahead

The old binaries got removed from testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: