[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007222: marked as done (transition: onetbb)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2022 20:16:28 +0200
with message-id <CAM8zJQtzPqA8ZnFhDFT-MGoamnn5=siWD31NjKX1Pcrr4BnKYQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1007222: transition: onetbb
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007222,
regarding transition: onetbb
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007222: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi release team,

This involves an upstream source name change (from tbb to onetbb),
as well as SOVERSION bump (from 2 to 12), along with a major API
change including some changes in the core API.

I should have submitted this after my local build test for the
reverse dependencies of libtbb-dev, but fellow developers from
debian-science are eager to see this in unstable to unblock
their works.

I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux
developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And
some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as
a result. I guess we can take similar measures for short
term workaround.

Ben file:

title = "tbb";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libtbb2" | .depends ~ "libtbb12";
is_good = .depends ~ "libtbb12";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libtbb2";
Thank you for using reportbug

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi

libtbb2 is now gone from testing.  Please file a RM bug for src:tbb
against ftp.debian.org, but maybe tag it 'moreinfo' until it is clear
what will happen to libtbb2's reverse-dependencies still in unstable.

Regards
Graham

--- End Message ---
Reply to: