[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1012362: marked as done (transition: luajit)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:01:14 +0200
with message-id <333b4f57-f447-7858-e879-4590d5cf1f14@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1012362: transition: luajit
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012362,
regarding transition: luajit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1012362: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012362
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

This bug is follow-up for this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2022/06/msg00009.html

The original LuaJIT upstream does not care about IBM architectures, which
causes problem in downstreams including us. I packaged src:luajit2 which
seems to be working well for IBM architectures. src:luajit2 can be used
as a drop-in replacement for src:luajit.

So, currently I have a pending commit[2] modifying the dependency template[1],
so that src:luajit reverse dependencies can be rebuilt without source
modification to allow library fallback.

Specifically, before transition, luajit reverse dependencies will have:
  Depends: libluajit-5.1-2
After transition, they should have:
  Depends: libluajit-5.1-2 | libluajit2-5.1-2
And the only thing we need to do is to upload the pending commit[2]
once approved. Then we just trigger a rebuild for all luajit reverse
dependencies.

This is a special transition that should not break any package at
all, as it is just inserting an alternative dependency.

(I don't know how to write a correct ben file for such special case.)

Ben file:

title = "luajit";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libluajit-5.1-2" | .depends ~ "libluajit-5.1-2";
is_good = .depends ~ "libluajit2-5.1-2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libluajit-5.1-2";
Thank you for using reportbug

[1] deb-symbols(5), this is an less-known advanced usage.
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/lua-team/luajit/-/commit/561f846d9c84587ffff6715eef086aeb9ff0fd80

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Mo,

On 20-06-2022 22:23, M. Zhou wrote:

I did not file the corresponding bugs.
Bug were filed and several packages were removed from testing. Nginx was fixed but required luajit to migrate, so that happened today. 

I'll ask ftp-master to remove the ppc64el binaries now.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: