[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1011271: marked as done (bullseye-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.151-1~deb11u1)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2022 11:47:43 +0100
with message-id <2280fe8c78e64b02a6c1d04c6dde5a32e342ba81.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates included in 11.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011271,
regarding bullseye-pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.151-1~deb11u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1011271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: tags -2 = buster

Hi,

I'd like to update nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/non-free to a new
upstream release fixing some CVEs. 

It comes with the same packaging fixes and improvements that already
reached stable in the 
  nvidia-graphics-drivers 470.103.01-3~deb11u2
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450 450.172.01-2~deb11u1
uploads.

The buster upload will only differ by adding a 'Rebuild for buster'
changelog entry with version number 390.151-1~deb10u1.


Andreas

Attachment: ngd-390xx-390.151-1~deb11u1.diff.xz
Description: application/xz


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Version: 11.4

(re-sending with fixed bug numbers)

Hi,

The updates discussed in these bugs were included in today's bullseye
point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: