Bug#1012362: transition: luajit

["M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org>]

Hi Paul,

I did not file the corresponding bugs.
According to our workflow, will I or the release team file those bugs?

If it is me who should file those bugs, I think the default severity
should be serious.

When all related bugs are resolved by reverse dependencies, I plan to
remove ppc64el architecture from both src:luajit and src:luajit2,
so that malfunctional binary packages are no longer built for it.


On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Mo,
> 
> On 13-06-2022 05:20, M. Zhou wrote:
> > So let's inform the reverse dependencies to remove ppc64el support,
> > or switch back to lua.
> 
> Just curious, have you already done so? If yes, care to share the bug 
> report numbers? Otherwise I assume you expected me to file those bugs?
> 
> Paul
> 
> elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R --suite testing luajit 
> --architecture=ppc64elW: -a/--architecture implies -p/--partial.
> Will remove the following packages from testing:
> 
> libluajit-5.1-2 | 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-6 | ppc64el
> libluajit-5.1-dev | 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-6 | ppc64el
>      luajit | 2.1.0~beta3+dfsg-6 | source, ppc64el
> 
> Maintainer: Enrico Tassi <gareuselesinge@debian.org>
> 
> ------------------- Reason -------------------
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Depends:
> lua-ljsyscall: lua-ljsyscall
> 
> # Broken Build-Depends:
> bpfcc: libluajit-5.1-dev
>         luajit
> cantor: libluajit-5.1-dev
> dnsjit: libluajit-5.1-dev
>          luajit
> efl: libluajit-5.1-dev
> fastnetmon: libluajit-5.1-dev
> love: libluajit-5.1-dev
> lua-ljsyscall: luajit
> nageru: libluajit-5.1-dev
> nginx: libluajit-5.1-dev
> obs-studio: libluajit-5.1-dev
> suricata: libluajit-5.1-dev
> uftrace: libluajit-5.1-dev
> wrk: libluajit-5.1-dev
>       luajit
> 
> Dependency problem found.