Bug#1012348: marked as done (transition: rocksdb)
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jun 2022 11:46:18 +0200
with message-id <Yq7wao5CON2RUNhh@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1012348: transition: rocksdb
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012348,
regarding transition: rocksdb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1012348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi RMs,
Transition request to show my intentions and track what's blocking.
Two packages, balboa and python-rocksdb are affected with the rocksdb
7.2.2 transition. The former builds fine while the latter uses a
library header that was changed big and renamed. Its upstream did some
updates [1] but not finished. Package maintainer is noted days ago
[2].
I don't know how long python-rocksdb upstream will take for the update. :(
Thanks for considering,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://github.com/NightTsarina/python-rocksdb/commit/be185cc96df366dc81bd46466341e7057d7775b6
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012074
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-06-06 11:38:52 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2022-06-05 10:26:25, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hi RMs,
> >
> > Transition request to show my intentions and track what's blocking.
> > Two packages, balboa and python-rocksdb are affected with the rocksdb
> > 7.2.2 transition. The former builds fine while the latter uses a
> > library header that was changed big and renamed. Its upstream did some
> > updates [1] but not finished. Package maintainer is noted days ago
> > [2].
> > I don't know how long python-rocksdb upstream will take for the update. :(
>
> Please go ahead. If python-rocksdb takes too long to get fixed, we can
> temporarily remove it from testing.
That's done.
Cheers
>
> Cheers
>
> >
> > Thanks for considering,
> > Laszlo/GCS
> > [1] https://github.com/NightTsarina/python-rocksdb/commit/be185cc96df366dc81bd46466341e7057d7775b6
> > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/1012074
> >
>
> --
> Sebastian Ramacher
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: