Bug#1013112: marked as done (angelfish: Uninstallabale due to Qt transition, but not listed on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:25:19 +0200
with message-id <Yqy4//5phnZfI8B2@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1013112: angelfish: Uninstallabale due to Qt transition, but not listed on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013112,
regarding angelfish: Uninstallabale due to Qt transition, but not listed on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1013112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013112
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: angelfish,release.debian.org
Version: angelfish/22.04-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
seemingly due to the current Qt transition
(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html),
angelfish becomes uninstallable (i.e. aptitude wants to remove it) if I
try to upgrade all the Qt packages in unstable.
Reason seems this dependency:
ii libqt5webenginecore5 [qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5] 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
The current libqt5webenginecore5 in Unstable only "Provides:
qtwebengine-abi-5-15-10".
But angelfish is not listed on
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html — not
even if I display the "good" ones.
So I assume that this transition misses relations to
qtwebengine-abi-5-15-10 and qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5.
(Filing primarily against angelfish, but also against release.debian.org
as it seems to be an oversight in this transition and a BinNMU by the
release team might fix this already.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (110, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.16.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages angelfish depends on:
ii libc6 2.33-7
ii libgcc-s1 12.1.0-2
ii libkf5configcore5 5.94.0-3
ii libkf5configgui5 5.94.0-3
ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.94.0-1
ii libkf5dbusaddons5 5.94.0-1
ii libkf5i18n5 5.94.0-1
ii libkf5notifications5 5.94.0-1
ii libkf5windowsystem5 5.94.0-1
ii libqt5core5a 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
ii libqt5gui5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
ii libqt5network5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
ii libqt5qml5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
ii libqt5quick5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
ii libqt5sql5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
ii libqt5webengine5 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
ii libqt5webenginecore5 [qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5] 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
ii libqt5widgets5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
ii libstdc++6 12.1.0-2
ii qml-module-org-kde-kirigami2 5.94.0-1
ii qml-module-qtfeedback 5.0~git20180903.a14bd0b-3
ii qml-module-qtwebengine 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
angelfish recommends no packages.
angelfish suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-06-17 12:07:48 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: angelfish,release.debian.org
> Version: angelfish/22.04-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> seemingly due to the current Qt transition
> (https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html),
> angelfish becomes uninstallable (i.e. aptitude wants to remove it) if I
> try to upgrade all the Qt packages in unstable.
>
> Reason seems this dependency:
>
> ii libqt5webenginecore5 [qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5] 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
>
> The current libqt5webenginecore5 in Unstable only "Provides:
> qtwebengine-abi-5-15-10".
>
> But angelfish is not listed on
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-4.html — not
> even if I display the "good" ones.
>
> So I assume that this transition misses relations to
> qtwebengine-abi-5-15-10 and qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5.
>
> (Filing primarily against angelfish, but also against release.debian.org
> as it seems to be an oversight in this transition and a BinNMU by the
> release team might fix this already.)
The tracker now also checks qtwebengine-abi-5-15 and I have scheduled
binNMUs for angelfish.
Cheers
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: bookworm/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (110, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 5.16.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>
> Versions of packages angelfish depends on:
> ii libc6 2.33-7
> ii libgcc-s1 12.1.0-2
> ii libkf5configcore5 5.94.0-3
> ii libkf5configgui5 5.94.0-3
> ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.94.0-1
> ii libkf5dbusaddons5 5.94.0-1
> ii libkf5i18n5 5.94.0-1
> ii libkf5notifications5 5.94.0-1
> ii libkf5windowsystem5 5.94.0-1
> ii libqt5core5a 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
> ii libqt5gui5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
> ii libqt5network5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
> ii libqt5qml5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
> ii libqt5quick5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
> ii libqt5sql5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
> ii libqt5webengine5 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
> ii libqt5webenginecore5 [qtwebengine-abi-5-15-5] 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
> ii libqt5widgets5 5.15.2+dfsg-16+b2
> ii libstdc++6 12.1.0-2
> ii qml-module-org-kde-kirigami2 5.94.0-1
> ii qml-module-qtfeedback 5.0~git20180903.a14bd0b-3
> ii qml-module-qtwebengine 5.15.8+dfsg-1+b2
>
> angelfish recommends no packages.
>
> angelfish suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: