[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007222: transition: onetbb



Hi

I've noticed some binNMUs failed on armel; mathicgb [1] (subsequently
fixed by maintainer upload) and r-cran-rcppparallel [2].  Both seem to
fail in a similar way:

/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/11/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so:
undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_8'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/11/../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so:
undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8'

  call: dyn.load(path, local = FALSE, now = TRUE)
  error: unable to load shared object '/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so':
  /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so: undefined symbol: __atomic_fetch_sub_8

I also noticed the following in the armel build of onetbb [3]:

dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol __atomic_fetch_sub_8 used by
debian/libtbb12/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so.12.5 found in none
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol __atomic_load_8 used by
debian/libtbb12/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so.12.5 found in none
of the libraries
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol __atomic_fetch_add_8 used by
debian/libtbb12/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libtbb.so.12.5 found in none
of the libraries

Is this something that can/should be fixed in onetbb, or should this
be fixed in the reverse-dependencies?

Additionally, r-cran-rcppparallel failed on mipsel [4] and mips64el
[5] with the following:

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ltbbmalloc: No such file or directory
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

This seems related to #1011112 [6].  What needs to happen here?

Regards
Graham


[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=mathicgb&arch=armel
[2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=r-cran-rcppparallel&arch=armel
[3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=onetbb&arch=armel&ver=2021.5.0-10&stamp=1655112619&raw=0
[4] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=r-cran-rcppparallel&arch=mipsel
[5] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=r-cran-rcppparallel&arch=mips64el
[6] https://bugs.debian.org/1011112


Reply to: